Señor presidente del Gobierno, the number of Izquierda Unida digo yo 'No'. Señor presidente, ¡quién le has visto y quién le coming! former behind the banner of 'No to War': No Iraq war, with the most late yes, but ... the war in Afghanistan, and now Paris leading the coalition, it resembles all other coalition: the coalition of the Azores.
But I say 'No' to this statement, 'No War' because the arguments of the intervention, although it has, unlike Iraq, a United Nations mandate, they are not human rights, democracy is not Libya, because neither human rights nor democracy are exported. Neither human rights nor impose democracy through war. On the contrary, the interests, strategic interests, political and economic interests in Libya and, above all, opens a new stage in international politics, and I do not like. I hate this new era where everyone sets their 'backyard' and is e 'backyard' governs with the support of others or with the consent or abstention of others: we in the Mediterranean, Russia in its environment, China in his, and the United States in all. Mr. Prime Minister, is and is not multilateralism, and also is not a future democratic government in the world.
Mr Prime Minister, it is not true, it is hypocritical to talk of human rights. At present there is cough 32 conflicts around the world almost the same, with very similar characteristics is that of Libya, where a despotic government, a tyrant who oppresses his people and in many cases, exterminate part of his people, tribe or who thinks differently than him, and though it would be sheer madness that international politics was the use of war to eliminate these situations. It would be folly because it would lead to global conflict. For this is not done. So other measures are taken.
Why do we do in the case of Libya? Why in the case of Libya in place policy measures that have been made in the first resolution, and say hurriedly hurriedly in the second resolution go directly to military intervention? Because Libya plays an important role in North Africa and the Mediterranean, and because we want to govern changes in the Mediterranean to our accommodation. Let us be clear: we want to govern the changes that are occurring, channel, control, and we also want to know and ensure the future of energy in the Mediterranean.
is not the responsibility to protect, ladies and gentlemen. This is the right to control, that is the question: the right to control our space, the right to control in our backyard, in our opinion is or can not do through war. Ladies and gentlemen, if it were a human rights issue, one must know that war, military intervention, exclusion in airspace cause more suffering, and have the experience, "causing more displacement, the situation fester and clashes, and hinder the solution of conflicts. Why have
for this strategy? Because our goal, as I said before, there are human rights, our goal is the defense and geostrategic interests. And, in my opinion, even for this purpose less 'holy' strategic interests and strategy of war is also wrong.
ladies and gentlemen, we propose, by contrast, are maintained in other cases policies have been successful, and I remember South Africa. South Africa was not bombed, nor do we bombard Palestine, Morocco bomb nor the Sahara, or Burma. Do not think any of those things. What we can do is to make maximum use of civilian means of the international community: to block the accounts of the tyrants, also seizing weapons that have no means to suppress their people and take steps to isolate these regimes politically. These measures were successful in the case of South Africa, have also been successful in other countries and not have to make things difficult in the case of Libya.
finish by referring to something I think is very important. Notice how have devalued the things we've gone from NATO! and No to war! to yes to this war and to lead. Devalue the permission of the House and became a mere ratification. This shows how things are devalued, but-and end-also demonstrates our own hypocrisy. It is the Odyssey, or, if the Odyssey, we're not from Troy to Ithaca, we are going backwards, from Ithaca to Troy. Thank you very much.
0 comments:
Post a Comment