By Ricardo Gil Lavedra, lawyer and Congressman of the UCR. Published in the newspaper La Nación
Whatever the merit of judicial decision that confirmed Macri processing must be fully respected. Involves the likelihood that the mayor has committed, as judges, a very serious crime. While
can not be excluded, its history, the national government has something to do with it, can not seriously be allowed a defense based solely on this presumption, no concrete elements to support it.
Since it is possible to quickly ascertain the facts in court, nor can be tolerated, so silent, subsisting as serious suspicion about the head of government, the clarification of the events by the Legislature appears to be an essential requirement.
The path of "self-judgment" is unorthodox. The impeachment proceedings should be initiated only in extreme cases, by institutional instability that entails. It is not, as the vote of censure parliamentarians regimes, a fact of life within the political system, but is somewhat traumatic, because the head of the presidential executive is elected by popular will. Impeachment is a control mechanism that can only be appealed if mediate serious causes.
addition, it appears that Macri is himself accusing the commission of crimes or malfeasance in office, but tries to use this mechanism to obtain a sort of confidence vote and interpret the rejection of impeachment if not met in the Legislature the severe majority needed to advance and resolve his removal.
Now, entangled in a discussion on if any one or another procedure may be cumbersome, time consuming and frustrating. Macrismo taken the decision to promote impeachment, counsel for practical reasons not to obstruct this path, which is not ideal, but it is not unconstitutional. One way or the other, it is important to create an environment for the elucidation of truth.
is alleged that the ruling party has a majority to block an adverse outcome. The objection is rhetoric, had told with that possibility in an investigative commission. The macrismo not decide, without assuming a political cost ratios, back to what emerges from public scrutiny of the facts.
All this is a sincere search for truth. Any manipulation that reflect an assembly, a stage assembled, a sham designed only to stave off the political damage produce opposite effects processing. Frustrate the demands of society and will strengthen the suspicions about the conduct of the head of government.
Even if you can think that we are facing an overacting a sober assessment of the facts indicates that the decision to promote impeachment takes the seriousness of the complaint which made Justice: a member of a conspiracy designed to make eavesdropping, committing the resources of the city.
In institutional terms, the positive is that the body constitutionally and politically empowered by being able to decide on the facts and, above all, that the people of the city to know the truth of what happened, hidden among the many accusations, and form their own opinion and not appealable.
Whatever the merit of judicial decision that confirmed Macri processing must be fully respected. Involves the likelihood that the mayor has committed, as judges, a very serious crime. While
can not be excluded, its history, the national government has something to do with it, can not seriously be allowed a defense based solely on this presumption, no concrete elements to support it.
Since it is possible to quickly ascertain the facts in court, nor can be tolerated, so silent, subsisting as serious suspicion about the head of government, the clarification of the events by the Legislature appears to be an essential requirement.
The path of "self-judgment" is unorthodox. The impeachment proceedings should be initiated only in extreme cases, by institutional instability that entails. It is not, as the vote of censure parliamentarians regimes, a fact of life within the political system, but is somewhat traumatic, because the head of the presidential executive is elected by popular will. Impeachment is a control mechanism that can only be appealed if mediate serious causes.
addition, it appears that Macri is himself accusing the commission of crimes or malfeasance in office, but tries to use this mechanism to obtain a sort of confidence vote and interpret the rejection of impeachment if not met in the Legislature the severe majority needed to advance and resolve his removal.
Now, entangled in a discussion on if any one or another procedure may be cumbersome, time consuming and frustrating. Macrismo taken the decision to promote impeachment, counsel for practical reasons not to obstruct this path, which is not ideal, but it is not unconstitutional. One way or the other, it is important to create an environment for the elucidation of truth.
is alleged that the ruling party has a majority to block an adverse outcome. The objection is rhetoric, had told with that possibility in an investigative commission. The macrismo not decide, without assuming a political cost ratios, back to what emerges from public scrutiny of the facts.
All this is a sincere search for truth. Any manipulation that reflect an assembly, a stage assembled, a sham designed only to stave off the political damage produce opposite effects processing. Frustrate the demands of society and will strengthen the suspicions about the conduct of the head of government.
Even if you can think that we are facing an overacting a sober assessment of the facts indicates that the decision to promote impeachment takes the seriousness of the complaint which made Justice: a member of a conspiracy designed to make eavesdropping, committing the resources of the city.
In institutional terms, the positive is that the body constitutionally and politically empowered by being able to decide on the facts and, above all, that the people of the city to know the truth of what happened, hidden among the many accusations, and form their own opinion and not appealable.
0 comments:
Post a Comment